The Dilemma of National Identity: Loyalty Beyond Borders

Understanding the complex dynamics of national identity is crucial for comprehending the relationship between individuals and their homeland. While official and legal documents mandate a certain form of citizenship and national loyalty, people may not always align their personal identities with their national affiliations. This article delves into the phenomenon of non-identification with one's own nation and explores the underlying reasons for this disconnect.

Official vs Informal Identities

Every individual residing in a country legally must identify with it officially. This legal recognition is documented through passports, ID cards, and other official documents that clearly state their citizenship. When filling out any official forms, whether for work, school, or other registrations, individuals are required to provide their nationality as it is listed on their identification documents. However, this legal identification may not always reflect a person's informal, internalized sense of belonging.

It is not uncommon for individuals, especially in certain regions, to feel more connected to their tribe or community than to their national identity. This is particularly prevalent in some African countries, where loyalty to one's tribe often takes precedence over national citizenship. The underlying reason for this phenomenon is often tribalism, which shapes individuals' loyalties and affiliations.

Tribalism and National Identity

Tribalism plays a significant role in the dynamics of national identity. In Africa, for instance, it is not uncommon for individuals to identify more strongly with their tribe than with the broader national identity. This can be attributed to historical, cultural, and social factors that have long defined individual loyalties in tribal communities. While every individual is legally a citizen of their nation, their personal allegiance may lie elsewhere.

Impact of Indignation Programs on National Identity

The phenomenon of individuals not identifying with their nation is not limited to specific regions but can also be observed in countries where external indoctrination programs have manipulated public perceptions and attitudes. Predominantly white countries have often been subjected to prolonged indoctrination by hostile external influences, leading to the propagation of concepts such as white guilt, anti-colonialism, and intersectional feminism. These programs aim to instill a sense of self-hatred and identify people with alternative nuclei, often at the expense of their national identity.

The indoctrination system teaches children and adults to question and ultimately reject their national heritage and ancestors. Instead, individuals are encouraged to embrace multiple alternative identities, such as BLM supporters, LGBTQ advocates, professional victims, rioters, and members of leftist groups like Antifa. This continuous and relentless assault on the mind has significant implications for national cohesion and identity.

Examples and Consequences

London, Canada, the United States, and other Western nations have been subject to these indoctrination programs. Educational institutions, in particular, have been key battlegrounds for such ideologies, influencing the younger generation through curricula and social initiatives. The impact of these indoctrination efforts can be seen in the fragmentation of national identities and the rise of identity politics.

It is important to recognize the ongoing nature of this indoctrination. Countries that have attempted to break free from external influence have faced severe consequences. The continuous and relentless nature of this indoctrination poses a significant challenge to the preservation and promotion of national identities.

Understanding the complexities of national identity is crucial for policymakers and academics. Recognizing the factors that contribute to non-identification can help in developing strategies to strengthen national cohesion and foster a sense of belonging among citizens.