Which Royal Family Member Raised Concerns about the Baby’s Skin Tone?

Recent discussions have centered around whether or not individuals within the royal family expressed concerns regarding the skin color of the baby of Meghan Markle and Prince Harry. Such speculations have often been met with misconceptions and outright accusations of racism. In this article, we will explore the truth behind these claims and the reality of the situation.

A Misleading Narrative

The narrative surrounding Princess Michael of Kent has been particularly contentious. Critics argue that her concerns about the baby’s skin color were rooted in racism, but this portrayal is largely exaggeration. Princess Michael of Kent is known for her controversial statements and actions, often centered around her perception of entitlement and cultural insensitivity.

Princess Michael of Kent: A Case of Misguided Enthusiasm

Princess Michael of Kent is a figure often criticized for her elitist and insensitive remarks. Her wearing of a golliwog brooch during a meeting with Harry and Meghan was misinterpreted and used to paint her as a deeply problematic figure. The golliwog brooch, while historically used in children's literature, is not a traditional or culturally significant symbol in the UK. Her actions, while possibly inconsiderate, do not justify the harsh judgments often leveled against her.

The Normal Curiosity of the Royal Family

The royal family, like any other family, is naturally curious about the appearance of their future grandchildren. It is common for families to wonder and discuss what their child might look like visually. This curiosity, however, is often framed in a more negative light when scrutiny is directed towards the royal family.

Family Curiosity and Expectation

It is entirely normal for both sides of a racially mixed couple to be curious about the physical traits of their child. In the case of Meghan and Harry, both sides of the family might have been interested in what the baby would look like. Warren, the author, being of mixed ancestry, shares a similar experience: his family was interested in what their child would look like. This is a natural curiosity, not a sign of racism.

The Race Card and Media Overreaction

The baby’s appearance became a political and social issue due to the media’s overreaction and the race card being played. Meghan Markle, aware of the heightened interest, used this curiosity to frame herself as a victim of racism. However, such a narrative does a disservice to the true nature of family curiosity and can exacerbate racial tensions.

Family Love Irrespective of Skin Color

Regardless of skin color, family members generally love their children and are genuinely interested in their appearance. This interest is innate and stems from natural curiosity rather than any underlying racial bias. Focusing on such speculations detracts from the celebration of a new life and can be counterproductive in fostering a harmonious environment.

Conclusion

The curiosity shown by the royal family regarding the baby’s skin color during Meghan Markle and Harry’s pregnancy was no different from the curiosity shown by any other family. These concerns were more likely to be rooted in natural curiosity and interest, rather than racism. It's time to move away from the race card and recognize the true nature of this family's curiosity and the love they have for their child.