Is Multiculturalism Doomed to Fail or a Reflection of Human Nature?

Is multiculturalism doomed to fail due to the alleged tribal nature of human beings? This article explores the fundamental elements of human behavior and the persistence of the nation state, debunking the myth that inherent tribalism defines human society. Instead, it presents a case for the adaptability and interconnectedness of humans, suggesting that multiculturalism is more than a fleeting trend but a permanent feature of human interaction.

Tribalism vs. Human Nature

While humans possess various innate traits, tribalism is not one of them. In overcrowded settings, the instinct to escape from congestion is common, whereas in vast deserts, the longing for human interaction often emerges. Centralization and decentralization represent two natural human tendencies. Total centralization, akin to a world government, and total decentralization or anarchy are seen as extreme cases. However, the reality lies somewhere in between, including various forms such as tribalism, which has persisted and evolved over time.

The Survival of the Nation State

Considering the above, how can we explain the enduring survival of the nation state for over 450 years? The answer lies in the recognition of cultural diversity and the remarkable adaptability of human nature.

Contextualizing Cultural Diversity

Few societies can claim to be culturally homogeneous. Every social group comprises a mix of conformists, innovators, and rebels, and variability across factors such as age, gender, status, and social role is inevitable. Throughout history, social groups have often faced challenges and changes, adapting to circumstances whether willingly or reluctantly.

Adaptability and Collaboration

'Human nature' is defined by the unparalleled ability to change, adapt, and collaborate, essential for the success of our species, not by tribalism. A literal definition of tribalism, as exemplified by the Bedouin proverb 'I against my brothers; I and my brothers against my cousins; I and my brothers and my cousins against the world,' applies only to small, extended family units, generally no larger than 150-200 individuals.

Historical and Contemporary Examples

Take, for instance, an Arsenal vs. Tottenham football match in North London. It astounds how easily an ethnically, economically, and culturally homogeneous group can erupt into violence over a completely artificial identity, or how distant others can adopt that same identity. Similarly, while groups outside the Western developed world may complain about Western influence, they often aspire to emulate those same values, further highlighting the paradox.

Is a Cultural 'Fail-State' Feasible?

The concept of a 'cultural fail-state' is abstract. Extinction or the irreversible loss of human potential due to the inability to adapt to changing circumstances could also be considered a failure. In the UK, discussions around multiculturalism often revolve around an 80% White British and 80% Christian identity, yet travel abroad reveals that many people still aspire to emulate Western values despite criticism.

English is the most widely spoken and taught language globally, and American and British products, customs, media, and technologies remain the most recognized and utilized worldwide. This cultural influence underscores the dynamics of globalization and the ongoing relevance of multiculturalism.

Conclusion

The perceived doom and gloom surrounding multiculturalism in the US and UK may reflect internal dynamics rather than external factors. Positive solutions to these challenges lie in fostering dialogue, understanding, and inclusivity, highlighting the positive aspects of cultural exchange and diversity.

By embracing human adaptability and interconnectedness, we can ensure that multiculturalism remains a cornerstone of global interaction and progress. This perspective offers a more accurate and optimistic understanding of the human condition, reflecting the rich tapestry of cultures that contribute to human success and resilience.