Why Did the US Not Colonize Japan and Reclaim It for Whites

The question of whether the United States would have colonized Japan and reclaimed it for people of white ethnicity is a complex one with a myriad of historical, ethical, and economic factors involved. Historically, the idea of reclaiming territories assumes a claim that was never originally held, and in the case of Japan, history does not support such an idea.

Colonial Ambitions and Ethical Considerations

One of the primary reasons the United States did not colonize Japan lies in the ethical and moral framework that the Anglosphere, particularly the United States, claims to uphold. Backstabbing an ally would go against the core values of trust and loyalty that these nations stand for. The U.S. has fought and bled with Japan during World War II, and this loyalty to a former enemy-turned-allied nation is unparalleled.

Moreover, the concept of reclaiming Japan for a specific race is not only ethically dubious but historically nonsensical. You cannot reclaim something that has never been yours. Colonies, historically, were often areas where another nation had once held significant power and influence, but Japan never became a colony in the typical sense.

The Reality of Colonization and Its Challenges

Colonies are no longer fashionable or economically viable. The collapse of the British Empire and similar instances have shown that maintaining control over colonies is costly and often does not align with contemporary economic realities. The tiny number of U.S. personnel would not have been sufficient to change Japan’s ethnic makeup in the same way as the prolonged British colonization of India did not alter India’s ethnic composition significantly.

Additionally, the attempt to turn non-white, foreign countries white has historically been an ill-conceived and misguided ambition. Colonial efforts have often resulted in conflict, resistance, and long-term instability, as seen in many instances throughout history.

Post-War Occupation and the Pacific Peace

During the occupation period, there was an abortive statehood movement, though it did not gain sufficient support to alter the course of history. This movement, while interesting, underscores the complexities of governance and the aspirations of a people who were resilient and determined to maintain their identity and culture.

The atomic bombings by the United States on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were carried out to avoid deaths on both sides, including American soldiers. Attempting to colonize Japan, especially given its ancient civilization and long-standing cultural heritage, would have been a catastrophic endeavor. The Japanese populace, deeply rooted in a 2,000-year history, would have fiercely resisted any colonial attempt, leading to significant casualties on both sides.

Post-War Reforms and Leadership

While it is true that the U.S.-led efforts post-World War II did involve significant reforms, such as introducing a pacifist constitution, promoting a constitutional monarchy, breaking the power of landlords, and establishing a market economy aligned with the U.S. model, these actions were more about reshaping Japan’s governance and sovereignty rather than colonizing it.

The U.S. aimed to ensure Japan’s stability and peaceful coexistence with the global community, aligning with American values of democracy, free markets, and respect for human rights.

In conclusion, the United States did not colonize Japan because it was never a colony, it would have been against moral integrity, and it would have been economically and politically infeasible. The U.S. instead focused on rebuilding Japan as a responsible and peaceful nation within the international community, aligning with broader global interests and principles.

As for the racist sentiment, it is fundamentally unproductive and counterproductive. Racist ideologies have no place in a society striving for equality and progress. Instead, investing in cultural understanding, mutual respect, and cooperation can lead to a more harmonious and prosperous world.