Michigan State Legislators Defying Trump: A Legal and Popular Vote Conundrum

Introduction

Why did Michigan legislators stand up to Trump and not appoint alternative electors? This article delves into the reasons behind their decision and explores the broader implications of their actions, particularly within the context of the electoral process, the legal framework, and popular voter sentiment.

Legislative Response to Trump's Election

After the 2016 election, some might think that Michigan legislators would once again appoint alternative electors to vote for Trump. However, reality was far more nuanced. State legislatures could have chosen not to certify the election results, as two lower officials did. Nonetheless, the intense political backlash that followed caused them to switch their stance. This decision is not merely a reaction to legal pressure but also a nod to the public's clear preference for a different path.

The Clear Popular Vote

The results of the 2016 election in Michigan were unequivocal. Democrat Hillary Clinton won with a majority, defeating Republican Donald Trump by just 10,704 votes. Despite these close margins, the electoral college confirmed Trump's victory. However, the 2020 election was different. Donald Trump garnered 47.8% of Michigan's vote, a significant improvement from 2016, but still far from a majority. This time, the results were even clearer, with Joe Biden securing the majority of the popular vote in many contested areas.

The Michigan Voter Sentiment

Michigan voters have historically not shown overwhelming support for Donald Trump. In 2016, 52.5% of Michigan voters voted against him. Even in a highly contested state, Trump's margin of victory was slim. Additionally, the Green Party candidate, Jill Stein, received a significant number of votes. This suggests that the majority of Michigan voters were not swayed by Trump's campaign promises.

Trump's Presidency and Disappointments

Trump's presidency brought mixed results. On one hand, Michigan voters had concerns about the "Muslim Ban," which he signed shortly into his term. Detroit, with its significant Muslim population, was directly affected. On the other hand, Michigan fared better economically under President Barack Obama. By 2018, Michigan's unemployment rate was significantly lower during Obama's presidency compared to Trump's tenure. The economy under Trump was marked by high unemployment rates, especially due to his trade policies, which severely impacted Michigan's manufacturing sector.

Political Shift and 2018 Elections

The 2018 elections in Michigan saw a significant shift to the left. Democrats secured statewide victories, flipping two U.S. House seats and taking over the majority in both the state senate and house. Michigan Governor, Secretary of State, and Attorney General were all replaced, with Democrats now in control. Trump's promises about reviving Michigan's manufacturing sector were largely unfulfilled, with some contracts and projects ending up in other states, as seen with GM's ventilator deal.

Economic Impact and Corporate Influence

Despite the disappointment in job creation, Trump's presidency had some economic perks for corporate America. For instance, General Motors (GM) received a significant contract to manufacture ventilators, which ultimately went to an Indiana plant. GM shareholders benefitted from the contract, with the stock market rebounding and dividend payments being distributed. However, these economic gains often came at the expense of local jobs in Michigan.

Conclusion

The Michigan legislators' decision to not appoint alternative electors aligns with a clear popular vote and a legal obligation to follow the electoral process. This action reflects the broader public sentiment against Trump and the desire for a change, both politically and economically. As the 2020 election results show, the people of Michigan have moved on, and their votes have made that clear.