Is There Still Some Control of British Rule Over India After Independence?

India's journey from British colonial rule to sovereign independence on August 15, 1947, marked a significant transition. This event symbolized not just the end of physical governance but also the beginning of a new era shaped by enduring legacies and subtle influences.

Legal Framework

The shift to an independent legal framework was gradual. While the Indian legal system was heavily influenced by British law, many legal institutions and laws were retained. The legacy of the British legal system in India can be seen through its legal architecture, judicial processes, and judicial interpretations. Contradictions and continuities in the application of law continue to shape Indian society.

Commonwealth Membership

India's membership in the Commonwealth of Nations, a network of sovereign states, evolved from a colonial relationship to a post-colonial alliance. This membership is based on shared history and cultural ties, not political control. However, the Commonwealth continues to serve as a platform for dialogue and cooperation between nations with a shared colonial past.

Cultural Influence

British cultural influences, particularly in language and education, remain profound. English remains an official language, a legacy of British colonial education systems. This has had both positive and negative implications. While it facilitated a globalized workforce, it also created a divide in societal dynamics.

Political Ties

While India maintains its sovereignty, political ties with the UK remain strong. Diplomatic and economic relations are part of India's broader foreign policy. This continued interaction ensures that India remains within the sphere of British political influence. For instance, the UK continues to be a significant hub for Indian students and professionals, and remains a key partner in trade and investment.

Controversial Legacy

The idea of 'Brown Sahibs' and 'White Sahibs' highlights the enduring impact of British rule. 'Gore Angrez Chale Gaye Aur Kaale Angrez Reh Gaye' (the White British left but the Brown British remained) encapsulates this notion. Here, some key points are explored:

Conquest of Fortresses

Contrary to the notion of throwing out the enemy fortress, India did not conquer any territory from the British post-1857. Significant battles, like the 1857 War of Independence, resulted in territorial gains but did not result in sustained British withdrawal. This suggests that while India achieved independence, the cultural and administrative influence continued.

Power Shifts and Alliances

During World War II, the British economy was weakened, and there were efforts to appease the US. The Atlantic Charter and the Naval Mutiny were pivotal moments that led to a broader push for Indian independence. However, the British had strategic interests in maintaining control through internal divisions. This is evidenced by:

Declaration of independence in a fragmented manner. Use of internal divisions and separatist sentiments. Manipulation of history and denial of Indian agency in events like 1857. Nehru's actions after independence, such as seeking approval for Cabinet appointments.

These actions underscore the subtle control that the British exercised through various mechanisms, ensuring continued influence even after formal independence.

Conclusion

The legacy of British rule over India is complex and multifaceted. While India transitioned to sovereignty, the cultural, legal, and political influences persisted. Understanding this history is crucial for comprehending the contemporary dynamics of India's relationship with the former colonial power.