India's Dilemma: Family Before Country

India, a land of deep-rooted traditions and complex social dynamics, often grapples with the age-old question of whether one should prioritize family or country over personal interests. While the traditional wisdom has long emphasized the importance of national service, modern times have brought new challenges that test this age-old principle.

Family First: A Common Priority

Very few Indians place the interests of their country above those of their family. This sentiment is widespread, with many individuals and certain societal groups prioritizing matters closer to home. Politicians, bureaucrats, police, and judges, collectively known as ‘Kleptocrats,’ often place themselves and their family above national concerns. Their actions often reflect personal and familial interests over the greater public good.

Historical Context: A Family Business

This deep-rooted personalism can be traced back to India’s political landscape, particularly the British Indian Political Service created in 1885. The Indian National Congress, which has been dominated by families since independence in 1947, illustrates this phenomenon. For instance, Nehru’s corrupt and nepotistic nature, combined with political maneuvering, led to his anointment as the first Prime Minister in defiance of public opinion and the popular vote for Patel and his supporters.

The Historical Value of National Service

However, the principle of family versus country is not a modern invention. Historically, particularly among the Brahmanas, the value of national service has been deeply ingrained in Indian society. This tradition dates back to ancient times, as depicted in the epic Mahabharata. One notable episode, the story of Ekachakra, provides a vivid example of the willingness to offer oneself for the greater good.

The Epistle of Ekachakra: An Ancient Creed

The Ekachakra episode tells of a village where the Pandavas stayed during their exile period. One day, a demon, Baka sura, threatened the village. The villagers had entered into an agreement with the demon that he would not harm them in exchange for a volunteer who would be sacrificed. Bhima, one of the Pandavas, bravely volunteered to meet the demon. Yudhishthira, the Pandava leader, explained that such sacrifices were essential for protecting the village. He emphasized that for the sake of the country, it was necessary to make such sacrifices, as exemplified by the willingness to give a family member to save a village, and even a village to save the country.

Modern Challenges and Contemporary Examples

Today, the challenge of family versus country persists, albeit in a different form. With the rise of nuclear families and the modern emphasis on individual freedom, the dilemma of sacrificing one’s son for national service is more pronounced. Many families today are caught in a dilemma when faced with the prospect of losing their only child to service or even sacrifice. This has led to uncertainty and wavering commitment among some families.

Nonetheless, there are countless examples of families and individuals who embody the spirit of the old tradition. Many young men and women choose military careers as a way of serving their country. Despite the risks, these individuals and their families continue to uphold the historical legacy of national service. This trend, although marked by occasional fatalities, persists and often runs across generations.

Conclusion: Embracing the Past for a Brighter Future

In conclusion, while the principle of family versus country remains a complex issue in modern-day India, the historical and cultural context provides a framework for understanding and addressing this contemporary challenge. The strength and resilience of families like those in the Ekachakra episode serve as a powerful reminder of the enduring values that can guide and inspire us in these times.