Why Western Poland Should Remain Part of Poland: Revisiting Historical Borders and Modern Sovereignty

The question of whether Western Poland should be part of Germany, or whether Western Ukraine and Belarus should return to Poland, is rooted in historical disputes and territorial reconfigurations. While these discussions might evoke passion and disagreement, they are ultimately best left to the current recognized sovereign states.

Historical Context and Territorial Divisions

No. The territories mentioned in the question belonged to different nations at different points in history. The idea that any territorial division from before World War II should be considered superior to current arrangements overlooks the complexities and dynamism of historical events. The right course of action is to adhere to the current territorial divisions as they are recognized both de facto and de jure.

Provocative Questions and Misconceptions

Questions about returning European territories to their historic owners often reflect a lack of understanding of historical and geopolitical realities. For instance, similar queries such as whether Alsace-Lorraine should be part of Germany, or whether Austria should be one with Germany, are rooted in outdated and often-nationalistic sentiments. These questions also extend to broader topics like Russian Kaliningrad, Lithuanian Memel, and the Sudetenland in the Czech Republic.

The Aftermath of World War II and the Redrawing of Borders

One critical moment in history that significantly influenced the current borders involved Joseph Stalin. As an all-powerful dictator with a vast empire, Stalin indeed had the power to change the fate of nations. In 1945, with a mere signature, he expelled millions of people from their ancestral homes and reshaped the borders of several nations. This decision, although controversial, has stood the test of time.

Whether Stalin's actions were right or wrong is a matter of debate and beyond the scope of this discussion. However, changing this situation would require a similarly powerful and influential figure, with a comparable level of global influence. The majority would likely agree that such a scenario is not desirable or likely.

The Role of Modern Sovereignty in International Relations

Modern sovereignty plays a pivotal role in international relations. While nostalgic and nationalist sentiments can lead to questions about the past, the current arrangement provides stability and peace. Poland, Ukraine, and Belarus, with their current borders, have long since embraced their sovereignty and independence.

It is important to recognize that Poland has no interest in regaining control over Ukraine and Belarus, which it governed in the past. Such a scenario would be against the principles of modern international relations and could lead to unnecessary conflict and instability.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the historical territorial disputes should be left in the past. The current territorial divisions of Western Poland, Ukraine, and Belarus are the result of complex historical events and should be maintained. Any desire to return to past territorial divisions would require significant changes in global power dynamics and would be unlikely to bring about lasting peace.

It is crucial to recognize the sovereignty of modern states and focus on fostering cooperation and mutual understanding between nations. This approach ensures stability and progress in the international community.