Why Did England Send an Entire Fleet Against a Single Spanish Armada?
Why Did England Send an Entire Fleet Against a Single Spanish Armada?
Unveiling the Myth of the 'Small Armada'
The term 'small armada' is an oxymoron. An armada, by its very definition, is a large and powerful naval force. However, the term has been inaccurately used to describe the Spanish Armada's fleet, which actually numbered over 130 ships. Contrary to popular perception, the might of the Spanish Armada was far from insignificant. The Spanish fleet was not 'small,' but rather vast, consisting of 137 ships in a massive formation. Despite having control over half the world, King Philip II of Spain underestimated England's resilience and strategic acumen.
As the Pope astutely noted: 'Ita€?s amazing that the king of half the world can be defied by the queen of half an island.' This statement highlighted the stark disparity in perceptions between the two nations. Spain was vast, rich, and numerous, but the English, despite their smaller size, demonstrated remarkable tactical and strategic prowess.
Comparing the Naval Strengths
Despite the size and wealth of Spain, the naval forces of England and Spain were vastly different. The Spanish Armada's fleet included 24 dedicated warships, which were the largest and most heavily armed at the time. These ships were complemented by 44 armed merchant vessels designed for Atlantic trade routes. Additionally, the Spanish fleet carried over 20,000 armed troops. England's military response was different in scale and type.
As a strategic response, England deployed 197 ships, but they were not all warships. Only 34 British ships were defined as warships; the majority were merchant vessels outfitted with a few cannons and pressed into service in a defensive capacity. Of these, only 30 weighed more than 200 tons. In contrast, the Spanish had 24 dedicated warships, which were larger and more powerful. Moreover, they had 44 armed merchant vessels designed for Atlantic trade routes, making them significantly more formidable.
The Battle: A Retrospective of Strategy and Tactics
The Spanish Armada's objective was to invade England and depose Queen Elizabeth I, but the English were prepared and strategic in their response. The English fleet, under the leadership of Francis Drake, attacked the Spanish Armada in a series of hit-and-run actions, keeping the enemy on the move and preventing any attempted landings.
The battle became a series of actions where the English ships harried the Spanish all the way up the English Channel. This strategy not only kept the enemy moving but also prevented any consolidation of the Spanish forces. The English used their smaller, faster, and more maneuverable ships to their advantage, particularly their knowledge of local sea and tidal conditions. These conditions were crucial, as the Spanish were hemmed in by the coast and wind, facilitating the English attack at Gravelines.
At the Battle of Gravelines, the English forces forced the Spanish Armada to disperse. They achieved their primary objective of stopping the invasion and dispersing the Spanish armada. However, the English success did not come without cost. The Spanish lost only seven ships to English action during the campaign: three sunk and four captured. But by forcing the Spanish to disperse and maneuver, the English strategically neutralized their threat.
As the Spanish attempted to return home, severe weather conditions caused significant damage. By the time the Spanish reached the North Sea, they had lost another 37 ships, wrecked on the way back. This was the ultimate defeat of the Spanish Armada, despite their initial numerical superiority and technological advantages.
Conclusion
The English and their naval strategy at the Battle of Gravelines provide a fascinating case study in military history. Despite the Spanish Armada being a large and powerful fleet, England's strategic and tactical outplay secured a significant victory. The lesson from this battle is that size and resource alone do not always equate to success. Understanding local conditions, ship design, and strategic positioning are often key factors in naval warfare, as evidenced by the English naval commanders in 1588.