Why Arabs, Egyptians, and Bangladeshis Differ in Their Approaches to Westernization

Recent discussions on the varying degrees of westernization among Arab, Egyptian, and Bangladeshi societies have sparked debate, particularly around the question of why North Africans, Pakistanis, and West Asians often appear less westernized compared to Bangladeshis, a more liberal Muslim-majority nation.

The Perception of Westernization in Islam

Conversations about Westernization in Muslim-majority societies often bring up a complex array of socio-political and cultural factors. Some argue that North African and West Asian nations have maintained a level of distance from Western values due to a historical and religious preference for traditional customs. Conversely, Bangladesh, a country with a strong liberal and progressive ideology, has embraced elements of Western culture while maintaining religious and cultural integrity.

Islamic Culture and Western Influence

Islamic culture has historically been resistant to complete Westernization, although it has absorbed various elements of Western influence over the years. Factors such as religious beliefs, cultural values, and historical events have shaped the extent of Western influence in these regions. For example, the concept of umma (the global Muslim community) emphasizes unity and religious duty, which can sometimes clash with liberal values promoted by Western societies.

The Role of Religion and Culture in Westernization

There is a significant difference between many North Africans, Pakistanis, and West Asians who see themselves as real Arabs, preserving a belief that they are chosen by Allah to purify their environments. This belief can foster a resistance to Westernization. On the other hand, Bangladeshis embrace a more balanced approach. They are liberal and progressive Muslims who strive to combine the cultural allure of the Western world with their traditional Islamic values. This balance is seen in their acceptance of modernity while still adhering to their religious principles.

One notable difference is the perception of Western civilization. For instance, when Mahatma Gandhi was asked about Western civilization, he famously replied: “If they [the British] are good, we do not need them. If they are bad, we disown them.” Gandhi’s statement highlights the complex relationship between traditional values and modern influence.

Modern Bangladesh: A Case in Point

In Bangladesh, there is a clear distinction between those who actively embrace Western influences and those who oppose it solely for perceived ideological reasons. While some critics argue that Westernization leads to moral decay, others acknowledge its benefits in terms of economic development and cultural progress.

There is a widespread belief that Westernization is essential for progress and development. However, this does not mean that Bangladesh has abandoned its cultural and religious foundations. Instead, the country has chosen to integrate Western influences selectively, maintaining a strong sense of national identity and cultural integrity.

The liberal and progressive mindset in Bangladesh is rooted in the principles of equality, justice, and continuous learning. While some may dismiss these values as a compromise, they represent a strategic approach to modernity that does not sacrifice core values.

Conclusion: A Balanced Approach to Westernization

The differing approaches to Westernization among Arab, Egyptian, and Bangladeshi societies reflect a broader spectrum of cultural and religious attitudes. While some regions resist full integration, others like Bangladesh embrace a selective and balanced approach. What is crucial is not to dismiss these different paths but to recognize and understand the unique historical, cultural, and ideological contexts that shape each society's relationship with the Western world.

Keywords

Westernization, Islam, Culture, Bangladeshis, Arabs