Universal Background Checks: A Barrier to Safe Firearm Borrowing and Transfer

The push for universal background checks (UBCs) is often portrayed as a measure to keep firearms out of the hands of dangerous individuals, but in reality, these requirements can unintentionally cause undue burdens, especially for law-abiding citizens. Examinations of these checks reveal numerous situations where UBCs could severely impact personal relationships, financial well-being, and even cost lives. This article aims to illustrate the shortcomings of UBCs in the context of firearm borrowing and transferring.

Background Checks in Everyday Scenarios

Under current proposals, universal background checks would be required for firearm transfers, regardless of whether the firearm is being purchased or loaned. This article presents several real-life scenarios that highlight the potential issues and inconveniences associated with such checks.

Example 1: A Friend in Need

Consider a scenario where your long-term friend, who is currently experiencing a difficult period, such as temporary depression, is recovering from surgery, or dealing with mood swings, asks you to store his firearms for him. This request, while reasonable, could become a legal issue if done without a background check in each direction. The consequences can be significant, as you could face legal penalties if you attempt to assist him without complying with UBCs.

Example 2: Hunting Equipment Borrowing

Another example is when you wish to borrow a hunting rifle from a buddy for a week. This simple activity, which should be a straightforward arrangement between friends, could become complicated if UBCs are mandated. The need for in-person background checks at an FFL (Federal Firearm License) licensed dealer may result in excessive costs and significant inconvenience.

Example 3: Temporary Protection

A more pressing example is a scenario where your sister, who is experiencing a dangerous situation, seeks your assistance to borrow a firearm. She has just filed for divorce and has a restraining order against her abusive former husband, known to be violent and unpredictable. The need for background checks could make it nearly impossible for her to promptly obtain a weapon in a life-threatening situation, leading to potential loss of life.

Consequences and Inconveniences

These examples illustrate the practical drawbacks of UBCs in everyday life. The 50 to 70 dollar cost per background check, along with the requirement to conduct the check in person at an FFL dealer, can present significant barriers. If the nearest FFL is far away, it might necessitate long travel or delaying the ammunition purchase, impacting both financial and personal situations.

Operational Challenges

The federal NICS (National Instant Criminal Background Check System) already struggles to process the volume of background checks it receives. The implementation of UBCs could lead to overloading the system, causing delays and potential breakdowns. Historical examples, such as the FAA’s outdated ATC system and the problematic rollout of the ObamaCare insurance registration, demonstrate the government’s inability to upgrade its systems efficiently.

Conclusion

While the intent behind universal background checks is understandable, the reality is that these requirements can cause significant inconvenience and potential harm. Instead of relying on UBCs to protect public safety, policymakers should focus on violence prevention, mental health support, and community-based safety measures. These alternatives can provide more effective and humane solutions without the legal and logistical burdens that UBCs currently represent.