Understanding why Pakistan Claims Kashmir as Part of Their Country: A Deeper Dive

For many decades, Pakistan has held a steadfast stance that Kashmir should remain a part of their country. This claim is not just a matter of sovereign territory but a strategic and emotional issue tied to the country's identity, politics, and military establishment. This article aims to explore the reasons behind Pakistan's claim, delving into the history, geopolitical context, and the role of the Pakistani military and civil establishment.

Historical Context and Partition

The dispute over Kashmir began in 1947 when India and Pakistan were formed as a result of the partition of British India. The princely state of Jammu and Kashmir had the right to accede to either India or Pakistan based on its own choice. However, the Maharaja of Kashmir chose to remain independent and did not issue a referendum. This decision led to a conflict that escalated into an invasion by tribal raiders and the Pakistani army.

The conflict was eventually brought to the United Nations, with India requesting a referendum for the Kashmiri people to decide their future. Nehru proposed a solution that would give Kashmiri people a democratic choice. However, Pakistan has not fully engaged with the UN resolution and has advocated for a plebiscite that it believes will favor its claims.

Military and Political Dynamics

).

The Pakistani military, which has played a significant role in the country's politics since its inception, has been a key factor in the ongoing dispute over Kashmir. The military's stance on Kashmir is not just about territory but a matter of national pride and strategic importance. The military's narrative emphasizes the historical and religious ties between Kashmir and Pakistan, framing the Kashmir issue as part of a broader struggle for Muslimistan, a contiguous Muslim-majority area in South Asia.

For Islamabad, Kashmir is a source of distraction from the stark economic and social issues facing the country. By focusing on the Kashmir issue, the political leadership can maintain the loyalty of its support base, including the military and extremist groups. The poor living conditions of many Pakistanis are often overlooked in the national discourse, as the government directs attention towards the supposed threat from India.

Contemporary Implications

Today, the situation in Kashmir remains tense, with sporadic violence and human rights concerns. While the Pakistani establishment has no immediate interest in resolving the Kashmir issue, the international community and the United Nations continue to call for a peaceful and negotiated resolution.

India, on the other hand, has made significant progress in integrating Kashmir into its governance structure and economy. The Indian government has taken steps to address the developmental needs of the region, including infrastructure development and social reforms. However, these efforts are often met with resistance from pro-Kashmir independence movements.

Conclusion

The debate over Kashmir is deeply entrenched in the political fabric of both India and Pakistan. While Pakistan's claim to Kashmir is rooted in historical ties and a strategic desire to hold onto the territory, it also serves as a rallying point for the country's population. The refusal to accept the UN resolution and engage in meaningful dialogue reflects a broader political and military strategy that has persisted for over seven decades.

As the region remains in a state of flux, it is crucial for the international community to continue to exert diplomatic pressure and promote a peaceful resolution to the Kashmir dispute, ensuring that the will of the Kashmiri people is respected.