Understanding Border Security: A Democrat’s Perspective
Introduction
Whenever the topic of border security arises, the media often centers discussions around political affiliations. However, such debates can be clarified by examining the fundamental definitions and specific criteria involved in maintaining border security.
The term closed border means that no one is allowed to enter or leave the country without authorization, much like the situation during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. In contrast, an open border refers to the scenario where there are no physical barriers or checkpoints, allowing free movement, as seen among the European Union countries. In practice, most countries have regulated borders where checkpoints are operational and people with valid documentation are allowed to cross.
Securing borders is not a political issue for a Democrat but a functional one. It involves ensuring that only qualified individuals can enter the country and that there is adequate oversight to prevent unauthorized entry.
Securing vs. Not Securing Borders
The key difference lies in the presence of security measures. Without security, anyone could cross the border wherever they choose. In contemporary discussions, a primary concern is ensuring that individuals entering the country meet specific criteria, such as having valid documentation and following proper procedures.
In reality, borders between states within a country are not meant to be secure. However, the border between the United States and its neighboring countries, such as Canada or Mexico, is designed to be secure, not unpassable. These borders are effectively managed to prevent unauthorized crossings and protect national security.
Legislative Efforts and Criteria
On a bipartisan level, the Senate bill aimed to enhance border security measures significantly. While it faced opposition and was ultimately vetoed by President Trump, the proposals included:
Hiring More Border Guards: The bill sought to hire 1300 additional border guards to bolster security. Instead, the Republican-controlled Congress only approved the hiring of 300 more guards. Increasing Immigration Judges: The current system faces significant backlogs due to the limited number of immigration judges. The bill proposed doubling the number of judges to 700, which would help reduce the time for “catch and release” proceedings and ensure timely hearings for immigrants. Statutory Closure Requirements: The bi-partisan bill included a provision that mandated the closure of the border if the number of daily encounters exceeded 5000. This measure is designed to address situations where the influx of border crossings becomes overwhelming.Defining Open Border
Right-wing groups often use the term open border to describe a situation they believe the left advocates for. However, they rarely provide a clear definition of what they mean by it. An open border typically implies a lack of restrictions and control, which is not the goal of any responsible government.
A Democrat’s perspective on border security is focused on ensuring that the border is effectively managed to maintain national security and protect the rights of those who enter the country legally. Security measures are necessary to prevent unauthorized entry by individuals seeking to avoid the proper procedures.
By examining these fundamental definitions and specific measures, it becomes clear that the issue of border security is one of practical governance, not just political affiliation.
Key Definitions: Closed border: No one enters or exits without authorization. Open border: No physical barriers or checkpoints, free movement. Regulated border: Checkpoints are operational, and individuals with valid documentation can cross. Motivation: Ensuring that only qualified individuals enter the country, maintaining national security, and upholding laws and procedures. Lessons: The necessity for bipartisanship in addressing critical issues like border security and the impact of political polarization on effective governance.