The Ethics of Foreign Influence in Elections: When Do Two Wrong Make a Right?

In the current geopolitical landscape, the question of whether countries should influence each other's elections has led to much debate. Critics often highlight cases where the United States intervenes in foreign elections while pointing out that other nations, including Russia, have been criticized for their actions in the U.S.

For instance, when former President requested Russian assistance in his 2016 election campaign, it raised eyebrows and questions about the ethics of such actions. This article aims to explore the complexities of foreign influence in elections, examining both the moral considerations and the potential justifications for such actions.

Why Russian Interference Was Different

It is true that during the Cold War, the United States spent considerable resources to prevent Russia from overpowering American democracy through force. However, the fact remains that the Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. election was seen as a significant and unprecedented breach of democratic norms. Critics argue that it undermines the integrity of the election process and can lead to long-term consequences for democracy.

For many, the U.S. has a right to be protective of its democratic process, especially when its own government has a history of safeguarding itself. When Russian entities, such as the Internet Research Agency or other state-sponsored actors, intervened in U.S. elections, it sparked outrage and calls for reform. This intervention not only raised concerns about the immediate election outcomes but also about the broader implications for American democracy.

анимация-Границы-и-Страны.png

While the United States is often wary of foreign interference, it is important to recognize that other nations do attempt to influence elections, both for allies and adversaries. For example, the United States has been accused of supporting opposition groups in other countries to disrupt regimes it deems unfavorable. However, the manner and methods used often depend on the nation's interests and values.

Justice and Legal Frameworks

When citizens of the United States are caught interfering in foreign elections, they face legal consequences according to the laws of the countries involved. Similarly, individuals and organizations caught influencing U.S. elections face charges under U.S. law. These legal frameworks aim to uphold democratic principles and ensure fair elections by holding all parties accountable.

For instance, if U.S. officials are found guilty of corruption or interference, they face severe penalties. President Trump's request for Russian interference, even if made as a joke, bordered on the impeachable offense of soliciting foreign aid. This action not only violated ethical norms but also legal ones. As such, it set a dangerous precedent and raised questions about the limits of government actions, especially in the realm of national security.

Equal Justice for All

The legal approach to foreign influence should be impartial. If American entities interfere in foreign elections, they should face the same legal consequences as foreign entities that interfere in U.S. elections. The principle of equal treatment under the law is crucial in maintaining trust in the democratic process. This helps to avoid the perception of double standards, which can erode public confidence in the electoral system.

For instance, the controversies surrounding the Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. election did not go unchecked. The U.S. government conducted extensive investigations, including the counsel into Russian interference. The individuals found to be involved faced criminal charges and sanctions, demonstrating that the U.S. is committed to upholding the rule of law.

A World of Vigilance

However, absolute vigilance against foreign interference is essential, not just in the United States but in every country. The ethical challenge is to balance the need for vigilance with the protection of democratic processes. Sometimes, the actions of one nation may seem unethical in the context of another, but from a broader perspective, they can be seen as necessary to protect broader democratic values.

For example, in countries with extreme government corruption, where the media and other institutions are controlled by the ruling regime, foreign influence might be justified. In such cases, external actors might intervene to ensure that the people have access to all the information necessary to make informed decisions. This could involve supporting credible opposition figures and helping to ensure that elections are free and fair.

It is important, however, that such interventions are done with caution and with the goal of empowering local populations rather than imposing a predetermined system of government. While such actions may be ethically justifiable, they must be carried out transparently and with the aim of promoting democracy and human rights.

In conclusion, while foreign influence in elections can be a source of concern for many nations, it is not inherently wrong. The key is to strike a balance between vigilance against interference and the protection of democratic integrity. As global citizens, we must remain vigilant and strive for a world where democracy thrives without being manipulated or undermined.