The Controversy Over Teddy Roosevelt’s Statue at New York’s American Museum of Natural History

The American Museum of Natural History in New York has recently announced its intention to remove a statue of Theodore Roosevelt, the 26th president of the United States, from its premises. This decision has sparked intense debate among historians, critics, and supporters, with some arguing that it is an unjustified attack on a revered national icon, while others claim that it is a long-overdue step towards recognizing systemic injustices in our nation’s history.

Dispute Over Removal

The decision to remove the statue has been criticized as lacking a democratic process or public vote. Instead, it is seen as an example of mob rule, where a significant portion of the public's anger and dissatisfaction has led to an undemocratic action.

Further, the removal is not going to be a modified or transformed piece of art, but rather the complete removal of the statue. This approach is significant, as it not only calls into question the statue itself but also the entire concept of tributes or memorials dedicated to public figures, especially historical ones.

Mob Rule vs. Democratic Process

The lack of a democratic process in this decision raises important questions about the role of the people in shaping public memory and the value of historical figures. Critics argue that this action is a destructive move that undoes the democratic values that Roosevelt himself championed.

While Theodore Roosevelt is known for his progressive policies and supports from the Democratic side, he was a Republican and a politically progressive one. He embraced government intervention in the economy, trust-busting, and environmentalism, which are values shared with contemporary progressive leaders. However, Roosevelt's leadership and policies were distinctly different, rooted in a strong sense of justice and a deep commitment to democratic principles.

Curiously, the left is now tearing down a statue of a Progressive President, suggesting a realization that their ideology has a problematic history, including aspects of racism, fascism, and other forms of systemic oppression.

The Role of the Left in History

The left has a dark past, with many echoes of systemic racism and historical complicity in various forms of oppression. Instead of confronting this history, the current approach is to tear down statues and art in an undemocratic manner, rather than reckoning with the painful truths of the past.

This act of destruction, without due process, does nothing to address the historical issues it aims to confront. It actually hinders the valuable role of public monuments in providing context, learning opportunities, and reflection on history.

Conclusion

While opinions on Roosevelt as a historical figure may vary, the most important aspect is the method by which decisions affecting public memory are made. A democratic method should be the means through which people make these choices. The option for mob rule and undemocratic actions cheapens the value of democratic values and norms.

It is crucial to focus on understanding and contextualizing historical figures and their legacies, rather than simply removing their monuments. By avoiding such actions, we can truly learn from history and ensure that future generations understand the complexities of our shared past.