The Argument Against Libertarianism: Why It's Self-Defeating

Libertarianism, as an ideology, places an exalted value on personal freedom, asserting that all other principles are derived from this fundamental concept. In theory, this seems ideal, but in practice, it is a self-defeating ideology. This article explores the core arguments against libertarianism, particularly its inherent contradictions and the role of the industrial revolution in shaping the modern state.

The Vagueness of Freedom

The term 'freedom' is indeed vague and requires clear definition. Libertarians often champion the concept of negative freedom, which involves freedom from interference by other persons. In this context, 'persons' are often the state. This perspective is understandable given the overbearing nature of modern states. However, this emphasis overlooks the complexity of the issue and fails to address the root causes of state expansion.

The Self-Defeating Nature of Libertarianism

One of the most compelling arguments against libertarianism is its inherent tendency to ignore the very mechanisms that enable state expansion. Libertarians often struggle to explain why the state has grown so large, citing vague ideas such as a 'leftist agenda' without delving into the systemic changes that have led to this state of affairs. This ignorance is not only troubling but also detrimental to their cause.

The Role of the Industrial Revolution

The industrial revolution and its technological advancements are at the heart of the contemporary state's growth and control. These technological advancements have restructured society in such a way that it inherently demands state intervention. Modern supply chains, for example, are a significant source of income for the state and require protection for both security and economic reasons.

Without the industrial revolution, the state would not have the wealth and power to exert such control. The interconnected nature of the world today, facilitated by technology, has led to intense global rivalries and conflicts, further necessitating a robust state presence. This is demonstrated by the rise in taxes, which correlate directly with industrial developments.

Illustrative Example: The Rise of Taxes in the US

The graph below shows the rise of taxes in US history, coinciding with the industrial revolution. This correlation is not coincidental, but rather a clear indication of how technology and industrial development have necessitated increased state intervention.

Failed Attempts at Libertarianism: The Case of Javier Milei

Some might point to the success of libertarian leader Javier Milei in Argentina as counter-evidence. However, an in-depth analysis reveals that while some economic aspects may have improved, poverty rates have increased, which has negatively impacted overall stability. The Industrial System requires the suppression of poverty to function smoothly, and Milei’s ideology must therefore be discarded. The mainstream media’s disdain for Milei is indicative of their alignment with the prevailing interests of powerful classes.

Inconsistency in Libertarianism

Libertarianism is also inconsistent in its application. While they emphasize individual freedom, they often support large, corporate entities whose activities are coercive. This contradiction undermines the core principle of personal freedom and makes the ideology self-defeating.

Conclusion

The argument against libertarianism is not solely based on theoretical inconsistencies but also on the empirical evidence of state expansion spurred by the industrial revolution. Understanding this context is crucial for any discussion of political philosophy and economic systems. The failure to acknowledge the role of technology and industrial development in shaping the modern state is a significant oversight that cripples the libertarian ideology's effectiveness.

Keywords: libertarianism, negative freedom, industrial revolution