Do You Consider Jordan Peterson a Modern Day Philosopher?

No. While he occasionally dabbles in philosophical discourse, Jordan Peterson's insights often transcend his actual areas of expertise. Many of his claims are dismissed as pure gibberish, especially due to the relatively low level of higher education among his fanbase.

Not a Philosopher in the Sense of Nietzsche

The idea that Jordan Peterson is a contemporary philosopher akin to Friedrich Nietzsche is a misnomer. While Peterson may have an intuitive sense of how he perceives the world, his lack of rigorous thinking often leads to misunderstandings of complex philosophical concepts. For instance, his interpretation of Nietzsche's concept of "the abyss" falls short of its true philosophical significance.

The Danger of Peterson's Philosophical Influence

Taking your "philosophy" from Jordan Peterson can be perilous, as his perspective on the world is not always grounded in rigorous thought. This can lead to a shift towards a faith-based ideology that usurps the place of proper, rigorous philosophy. Peterson often substitutes clear, nuanced philosophical ideas with more accessible or personally relatable concepts, such as the "shadow side" of personality. This can reduce the perception of the world to a more solipsistic understanding, where our subjective experiences are the primary lens through which we perceive reality.

The Reduction of Thinking to Solipsism

A key issue with Peterson's interpretations is the reduction of philosophical knowledge and experience to an individual's subjective perception. For instance, Peterson's reimagining of Nietzsche's "the abyss" as a not-so-dark, potentially rewarding experience is problematic. This reductionism insulates individuals from the roiling currents of the unknown and the vast complexities of the universe.

Take, for example, the concept of "the abyss." Nietzsche's use of this term is rooted in the struggle with incomprehensible existential challenges. Peterson's interpretation, however, casts it as something more akin to a personal challenge, thereby mitigating its larger, existential implications.

The Consequences of Reducing the Unknown

Reducing the "abyss" to a personal challenge is not without its consequences. It creates a more controllable, personal realm at the expense of a broader, more objective understanding of the world. Peterson's role as a psychologist and sociologist leads him to prioritize familiar, psychological explanations over more profound philosophical insights. This can be likened to a collapse of the vast universe into something more manageable and familiar.

Image by Baptiste Photography on Unsplash

The problem with this approach is that it constrains our understanding of the world. By reducing the infinite variability of the universe to the confines of the ego, we miss out on the possibility of encountering and engaging with the truly unknown. This can be detrimental to human development, as it hinders the growth of complex, multifaceted understanding and creativity.

Conclusion

While Jordan Peterson may offer some compelling insights into the human psyche and social dynamics, his interpretations of philosophical concepts such as "the abyss" often fall short of their true philosophical significance. The danger lies in the potential for his ideas to shape a generation's understanding of the world in a predominantly solipsistic and familiar way. As such, it is important to approach his work with a critical eye, recognizing both its potential benefits and its limitations.

Key Takeaways:

Jordan Peterson is not a philosopher in the sense of Friedrich Nietzsche. Misinterpretations of philosophical ideas can lead to a collapse of complex concepts into more familiar, subjective terms. Reductionism can hinder the broader understanding of the world and human experience.

Keywords: Jordan Peterson, Philosophical Ideas, Nietzsche's Philosophy