The Case for Proportional Response in Israel/Palestine

What would happen if Israel treated the Palestinian Arabs the way the Palestinian Arabs act toward Israel? The answer is clear: it would lead to a significant improvement in the living conditions of Palestinians. Israel's current disproportionate retaliation, including massive bombing assaults and the imposition of apartheid policies, has resulted in far more harm to the Palestinian population than the other way around. By adopting a more balanced and proportionate approach, Israel can pave the way towards peace and potentially achieve a one-state solution with equal rights for all.

Excessive Retaliation and Apartheid Policies

Israel's current policy of using an overwhelming military force in response to small-scale attacks by Palestinian militants is not only ethically compromised but also disproportionately harmful to the Palestinian community. Instead of launching massive bombing campaigns, Israel should respond with targeted and proportional measures. For example, if a few Palestinians fire small rockets, Israel should retaliate with small rockets, rather than air force interventions that result in significant casualties.

The apartheid policies imposed by Israel on Palestinians are unjust and should be stopped. Palestinians do not impose such policies on Israel, which further highlights the need for a more equitable approach. The situation in the West Bank, where illegal settlers engage in terroristic activities against Palestinians, should be addressed by downscaling these activities to match the less severe level of Palestinian attacks.

Ending Unnecessary Military Presence

The Israeli military's continued invasion of West Bank homes, the brutal siege of Gaza, and persecution of Gazan fishermen are examples of how Israel's excesses have caused significant suffering to the Palestinian population. By lifting these oppressive measures, Israel can take a significant step towards improving the well-being of Palestinians and fostering a more peaceful environment.

When it comes to Gaza, Israel should lift the siege, as no Palestinians have ever held Israel under siege. Similarly, the Israeli armed forces should stop persecuting and murdering Gazan fishermen, since no Gazan fishermen engage in similar attacks on Israeli fishermen. These actions would demonstrate Israel's commitment to proportionality and human rights.

Reciprocal Threats and Ethical Treatment

It's important to note that despite numerous provocations, Israelis are unwilling to treat Palestinians in the same way as they are treated. Israeli citizens value their lives and take great lengths to preserve them, which is evident in the continued provision of basic services to Gaza despite the adversarial relationship. The ethical standards of medical treatment ensure that PA terrorists injured in attacks receive the same care as their victims, highlighting the humanitarian principles that should guide both sides.

Furthermore, the democratic rights of Arabs in the Knesset must be respected, despite their call for the destruction of the Jewish state. While it is understandable that the leadership of the PA promises no Jews will have voting rights in their future state, the only way to progress towards a civilized and democratic environment is for Israel to continue taking the high road. This includes coping with the consequences of the current situation and hoping for a shift in Palestinian leadership and behavior.

Conclusion

Israel's disproportionate response to Palestinian actions has led to a cycle of violence that has done more harm than good. By adopting a more proportional and humane approach, Israel can contribute significantly to the path towards a lasting peace. This includes addressing the issues of apartheid, ending unnecessary military presence, and ensuring ethical treatment for all. With continued efforts and a willingness to make difficult choices, Israel can work towards a one-state solution with equal rights for all, creating a more peaceful future for both Israelis and Palestinians.