Europeans' Attitudes Towards Non-European Immigrants: A Critical Analysis

Recent discussions on the topic of non-European immigrants taking over have sparked intense debate across Europe. While some Europeans feel uneasy about what they perceive as a gradual replacement, many others seem to approve of this trend. This article delves into the complex psychological and social factors behind these attitudes, highlighting the influence of media portrayal and psychological manipulation.

The Psychological Elephant in the Room

The number of Europeans who support the idea of being replaced by non-Europeans is surprisingly high, despite the discomfort it may cause. This approval is often linked to a form of brainwashing that suggests that those who are open to such changes are morally superior. The concept is deeply troubling when one considers that measuring moral superiority by accepting or even facilitating one’s own conquest, replacement, and eventual extinction is not a standard practice.

Buying into the Propaganda

Many Europeans appear to buy into the narrative that supports this form of replacement. Social media and media outlets play a significant role in brainwashing the population. They disseminate the idea that resistance to non-European immigration is evil and unintelligent, while supporting such changes is deemed good and intelligent. This divide serves as a strategic tool for the proponents of this replacement, effectively silencing any voices that oppose it.

It is important to question the arbiters of such judgments. Who decides what is good and what is not, and what ethical base does one use to determine the value of a race or a culture? The psychological manipulation that leads to such self-sabotage is a critical concern. When people are so eager to be part of a group, they accept practices that go against their basic instincts of self-preservation.

A Case in Point: The Media's Role

A telling example can be seen in the way the media portrays non-European immigrants. The narrative often depicts these immigrants as highly intelligent individuals who have overcome significant challenges to succeed. The implication is that if immigrants with no money, no connections, no recognized academic credentials, and barely speaking the local language can succeed, they must be incredibly smart. This portrayal can be misleading and does not always reflect the reality of success.

It is crucial to recognize that there is nothing inherently wrong with valuing and wanting to preserve one's own race. However, the brainwashing process has led many people to believe otherwise. The media’s influence should be examined critically, and the driving forces behind these narratives should be questioned.

Conclusion: A Call for Critical Thinking

As European societies grapple with the complex issue of non-European immigration, it is essential to promote critical thinking and independent analysis. The divisions created by media manipulation and brainwashing need to be addressed. Understanding the psychological and social factors at play can help in developing more informed and ethical perspectives on the issue.

Lastly, it is imperative to reflect on the importance of preserving one’s own culture and identity. While embracing diversity is a positive trait, blindly accepting the replacement of one’s own race is not a healthy or ethical stance.