Commissar Picard vs. Traditional Commissars: A Guardsman's Perspective

The popular Star Trek character Jean-Luc Picard, when vested with the role of a Commissar in the Imperium, would be a benevolent and reasonable figure, unlike the traditional Commissars who often view the guardsmen with suspicion and punish them for minor offenses.

Commissar Picard Would Ute a General, Not Sensitive Troops

Imagine a situation where a dark power is attempting to corrupt the men under his command. Jean-Luc Picard, with his martial prowess and diplomatic skills, would see that off without hesitation. His approach is pragmatic, prioritizing the safety and integrity of his troops. Unlike traditional Commissars, who might put the blame on the soldiers for 'cowardice', Picard would take action against the general responsible for putting the troops in danger.

Protecting Soldiers in Times of War

During a war, if someone brings a case that thousands of guardsmen might die to win a battle, Picard's response would be unequivocal. He would stand firm against such shortsighted thinking. This might be the case with someone named Chenkov, known for making decisions that favor the larger strategy over the safety of individual soldiers. Picard's integrity in such moments would ensure that the guardsmen are not the ones to bear the brunt of such decisions.

Saving Children from the State’s Clutches

When it comes to the state’s demands, such as taking away children from their parents, Jean-Luc Picard would be a staunch advocate for the rights of the guardsmen. His stance would not waver even if it means going against his own superior officer. This includes standing up to a Lord Commissar who might attempt to push such policies through without consideration for the families involved.

Shining a Light on Internal Security Phrases

When a planet causes problems for the guardsmen, perhaps under the guise of 'Internal Security', Jean-Luc Picard would not be fooled. He would see through such ploys and ensure that the guardsmen are not subject to unfair treatment. His credibility and leadership in such situations would be invaluable to the troops under his command.

Forgiving Officers and Strengthening Loyalty

Should an officer, whether a commissioned or non-commissioned one, disobey a direct order, Jean-Luc Picard would not punish them harshly but instead seek to understand their actions. This understanding could strengthen their loyalty to him, thus improving the overall morale and efficiency of the unit. A traditional Commissar might treat such an officer with severe punishment, but Picard would only find a way to both uphold discipline and foster trust.

Defending Against Surrender Demands

In the face of an enemy force demanding surrender, such as the Eldar, Jean-Luc Picard would have the courage to stand up to them. His words would be harsh, but just, ensuring that the guardsmen do not capitulate without a fight. This would not only protect their honor but also their lives.

Facing Persecution by Religious Authorities

Should a Confessor or a Lord Inquisitor attempt to persecute his guardsmen, Jean-Luc Picard would not back down. He would stand firm, even if it means facing the wrath of the religious authorities. A famous scene from a video called The Drumhead shows Admiral Satie, the persecutor Thomas Henry, storming out in disgust when confronted by Picard’s resistance. This would be a display of the strong convictions that Jean-Luc Picard holds dear, ensuring that the guardsmen are protected from unjust persecution.

However, when its comes to more traditional Commissars, represented by a character like Tim Weston from a reality show, it's clear that even a seemingly harsh figure can be reasonable. Weston has been known to go out of his way to help recruits, ensuring that the guardsmen under his supervision are not particularly screwed. This shows that, in the end, the relationship between a soldier and their Commissar is crucial, and a benevolent, fair Commissar can make a significant difference.

In conclusion, Jean-Luc Picard would be a commendable Commissar for the guardsmen, ensuring their respect, protection, and reasonable treatment. The likelihood of the guardsmen bearing the brunt of measures they find unjust would be virtually zero under his supervision. Traditional Commissars, on the other hand, could very well ruin the lives of the guardsmen if they enforce unjust practices.