Choosing Words: From Homeless to Houseless

The debate over how to address individuals experiencing homelessness often centers on which words to use. The traditional term, homeless, is widely recognized but can sometimes carry negative connotations or reduce a person's identity to their housing status. On the other hand, the term houseless emphasizes that homelessness is a situation rather than a permanent identity, potentially offering more respect and compassion.

The Evolution of Terminology

A person’s identity can play a significant role in how they are perceived and treated. Tony, a former long-distance hobo, encapsulates this sentiment. He spent 50 years riding freight trains before his health prevented it. Despite his long history with the term, Tony reflects that in today’s politically charged atmosphere, labels like homeless and hobo can feel derogatory. He now supports the term houseless as it better reflects the reality of his situation and the situations of others.

The Impact of Words

When interacting with individuals experiencing homelessness, it’s crucial to treat them as human beings first. Many have signs that say “hungry,” not “experiencing hunger.” This small change in wording underscores the importance of seeing them as individuals rather than a label. It’s our responsibility to recognize and respect the fact that individuals are more than just their housing status.

The Nature of Homelessness

Homelessness is often seen as a condition brought upon individuals by their circumstances. However, Tony's reflections pose a more profound question: why do affordable shelters and necessary resources remain unavailable, prohibiting others from making their own shelter? For thousands of years, people have built their own living spaces, congregating and structuring environments that provide shelter. The issue is not simply a personal choice but a societal structure that disproportionately affects certain individuals.

The Importance of Considering Alternatives

The term houseless reflects a shift in perspective. It suggests that the condition of lacking a permanent shelter is an external force rather than an internal attribute. This terminology shifts the focus from the person to the societal structures that prevent them from having a home. It’s a call to question the very systems that create barriers to shelter and address the root causes of homelessness.

Conclusion

The choice of words when discussing individuals experiencing homelessness is not just about politeness, but about respect, empathy, and responsibility. By using terms like houseless, we acknowledge the complexity of the issue and the need for broader societal changes. Let’s strive to see these individuals as complex human beings, not just victims or labels. It’s a call to reflect on our own roles in creating a more just and inclusive society.